cykelops:

cykelops:

you think youre a loki stan? my dad turned off Thor 2 after loki fake died. I had to spoil the ending for him so he would finish it

picture a 64 year old man with the temperament and the looks of ron swanson watching the Thor: Ragnarok trailer completely blank faced, until Loki shows up and he smiles and says “Mira! Ese es Loki”

veronica-rich:

lauramkaye:

marloviandevil:

alisgravenil1and2:

afro-elf:

afro-elf:

thor (2011) is an interesting movie to me because i think, despite a few flaws, the reason it never really took off the way iron man or cap:tfa did was because the audience it reached didn’t match the intended audience. the intended audience was so confused by what they saw because it didn’t reflect their ideal in terms of what they thought a thor movie would be, while the audience it ended up attracting claimed the empty spaces and turned their “sub-fandom” into something that practically rejected the fandoms of mcu!iron man and cap at that time

what i’m trying to say here, in essence, is this:

thor (2011) is a chick flick

to prove my point, i went to the world’s most trustworthy database on film analysis, urban dictionary, and found a few definitions obviously written by men

A film that indulges in the hopes and dreams of women and/or girls. A film that has a happy, fuzzy, ridiculously unrealistic ending.

word which refers to movies characteristically geered at young females in their twenties and late teens. Must include: love scenes, kissing, something sad, a happy ending

A sappy film that is generally geared towards women. It is always a love story, usually a comedy, and nausea inducing in men.

Term for a movie geared for women. Quite often seen on cable TV like The Hallmark Channel and endorsed by people like Oprah. These movies make women the heros and show life from a woman’s perspective. Most men hate these films cuz they are cheezy and dumb. Pussy-whipped men like them…or pretend to.

A movie that embodies all that is wrong with the world; a movie which displays a gross over-indulgence into, and exploration of, the workings of the female psyche and the accomanying emotional tendencies.

Pornography for women.

every complaint i have EVER seen about thor (2011) was about anything contained to earth: jane, darcy, not so much selvig, thor being hammer-less and learning to calm down and be gentle, women only liking it because hemsworth is a 6′3 outback steakhouse victoria’s filet mignon with twinkly dream eyes

but i think that’s because that’s the sentimental part of the movie, the emotional part. it’s driven by a romance and the intellect of a woman (arguably two). thor has to learn to get in touch with his softer side in a world that’s a bit more fragile than his own, furthermore there’s no other steaks– i, em, i mean men like him to balance out. there’s no male audience vessel in this movie

none

oh, you’re thinking selvig? i’m thinking not! there’s no male audience vessel. 

men can’t relate to this movie

oh, you think they can relate to THOR? in the words of drax, “this is not a dude, you’re a dude. this… is a man”. thor is the ideal boyfriend figure, he belongs to everyone who wants a boyfriend, all the thor stans i know are women and/or like men, if you’re a thor stan and a straight guy i automatically have my suspicions and my eyes are guarded by red flags 

#THOR 1 IS A SHAKEPEAREAN CHICK FLICK #THOR IS FOR WOMEN AND THE GAYS AND THAT’S JUST FACTS #the reason why thor’s been called unrelatable for so long was #cos cishet dudes could not fucking relate to him #COS HE A KING MADE OUT OF SUNSHINE WHO LEARNS AND APOLOGISES #FOR HIS MISTAKES #SOMETHING THEY’RE INCAPABLE OF (via @spacefloozy)

You had me at

hemsworth is a 6′3 outback steakhouse victoria’s filet mignon with twinkly dream eyes

I don’t see a lie

I thought I would hate Thor when my sister made me go, and I was pleasantly disappointed. I still like that movie a lot.

The meme about black panther you reblogged disregards the ancestral connections that descendants from African slaves have with each other, regardless of familial connections. I know you’re not black so I wouldn’t expect you to know all this but be more critical of memes like that

oh damn. you’re 100% right, i didn’t know that. i’ll try to be more critical of memes like the one i reblogged from now on. would it be better to delete the post, or should i just leave it be/find a post that explains the faults in the meme and reblog that too?

icyxmischief:

claracivry:

Not quite whump exactly, possibly more fanon than anything else, but I love all the little scenes in Avengers that imply that Loki’s connection with the Chitauri was not pleasant or friendly, but rather… painful. And all the threats and general mistrust that lead you to think why were they working together in the first place?

It’s…not just an implication, though. 

Okay, I just. I love this photoset, and no disrespect to the OP, but I am getting tired of people outside the Loki fandom behaving as if our belief that Thanos mistreated Loki is “just headcanons.”  There is ample canonical evidence.  Like, you can take Loki or leave him.  No one is excusing his past behavior, and no one is saying he’s a character everyone is gonna love. But let’s just call it like it is: Loki has PTSD from working under Thanos.  

1) Loki worked under Thanos at the same time as Nebula and Gamora.  Like the sisters, he was a fieldmarshal, “child,” and “collectible” of Thanos’s; like all abusers and warlords throughout fiction and actual world history, he uses the psychological tactic of taking the young specimens of a conquered civilization and assimilating them into his own “culture,” in this case an enormous mercenary intergalactic army, for his own purposes, therefore both debasing and demoralizing the enemy.   Nebula and Gamora both suffered “enhancements” to their body chemistry and, in Nebula’s case, to their anatomical structure****  in order to be made better fit to find Infinity Gems.  What was Loki’s role under Thanos? To secure an Infinity Gem.  It is inescapable that Loki was mistreated by Thanos. Why else would he hate him so much for “saving” him and equipping him with power? 

2) Why did Loki work under Thanos, if Thanos mistreated him? Because, as the Other made explicitly clear, to deny Thanos his wits, knowledge, and resources would be to be tortured and killed.  If Loki wanted to ever see life beyond Thanos’s grasp, he had to provide the Tesseract.  Having earth to rule in Odin and Thor’s image was just a consolation prize; Loki’s main goal was to SURVIVE THANOS.  I don’t blame people for not realizing this upon seeing Avengers Assemble; the movie was enjoyable but the writing was often convoluted and unclear, making it seem as if Loki’s only goal was to be a “diva” who “freed people from freedom.”  All of that was a distraction.  

3) How do I know that? Not just because of little morsels of evidence, like Loki showing signs of heat exhaustion and back injury, but for bigger, more incontrovertible reasons:  Loki’s conversation with Thor at Stark Tower, during the Chitauri Invasion, before stabbing him in the side.  A deleted scene shows that the Other CAN HEAR LOKI  and not even necessarily through the Mind Gem in the scepter,  as does a scene in the gifset above, and the Other will take all of Loki’s disobedience directly back to Thanos. Therefore when Thor pleas with Loki to join forces with him, Loki is not at liberty to agree; he has to say “it’s too late” and flee, even though he is brought to tears, lamenting the “sentiment” that he wishes he could acknowledge and indulge, but it would get them both killed. Remember at this point Thor has no idea Thanos even exists, but Loki does.   And Loki knows that there will be unending torture, not just from threats, but from experience, if he fails. 

4) Loki hid on Asgard as Odin.  Does anyone really believe that was just to be lazy, drink wine, and watch plays of himself?  No.  He was hiding from Thanos, particularly with the knowledge that he had sent the Aether, another Infinity Gem, to the Collector, and kept the Tesseract safely stored in Asgard’s Vault.  Hell, I could speculate that he didn’t even know the Infinity Gauntlet was a fake, as Hela revealed, and thought that as long as that was hidden in the Vault, he was safe, but again, this post is not about speculation. But why is Loki so terrified of Thanos that he’d put his entire life on hold and masquerade indefinitely as Odin?  Because Thanos is a monster and mistreated him.  

5) Probably most importantly, Tom Hiddleston discussed the script of Avengers with Joss Whedon and they decided explicitly that Thanos AND the Chitauri physically and psychologically abused Loki.  (I do not have the old 2012 interview link but if anyone reading this does, please send it).  

I have more reasons but honestly? Tl;dr Thanos mistreated Loki.  It’s a fact, like “Loki has black hair.”  As someone who has PTSD and as someone who has training in counseling, I happen to think it informs his behavior for every film installment from Avengers 1 on.  You can reject Loki as a character, but you cannot reject the facts about his backstory. 

****please note that Nebula was disfigured simply in a fit of sadistic pique over how she couldn’t measure up to her sister, and later when the siblings formed a healthier emotional bond, Thanos killed Gamora in front of, and to further spite, Nebula.  And anyone thinks Thanos wouldn’t also have enough spite to do direct harm to Loki? 

****Bear in mind also that the Tesseract/Space Gem, while not controlling a mind overtly, does have negative psychological affects, much like substance abuse.  Thanos used that to hook Loki–much like Loki used it to hook Bartonand Selvig–and provide himself an insurance policy of absolute obedience.  Like, that’s also canon.  Not piddling, not headcanons, not grasping at straws. CANON. 

juliaslouisdreyfus:

starkstrangers:

heart-of-gold-titanium-alloy:

shamelessbookaddict:

flower-child-bucky:

becky012:

spideykisses:

underoosstark:

teamironmanforever:

marvelmarvelmarvel:

losingmymindtonight:

armoredsoftie:

ironmess:

okay but when thanos stabbed tony the entre theather went completly silent

i had a small heart attack im sure i lost like 4 years of life

I heard some girl a row behind me whisper, in the most terrified voice I’ve ever heard, “oh shit”

We were all trying to not cry whilst some 20-something dude behind me in the tiniest voice went ‘what the fuck’ and the whole cinema went deadly silent

I actually screamed no and my friend had to clamp his hand on my mouth because I literally was about to lose my shit. Like I started shaking it was not a pretty picture.

I was so sure he was going to die, and I thought I was prepared until that exact moment

I was probably the girl that said “oh shit” tbh

I went “NO. NO WAY.” and the whole theater gasped. I heard one guy screaming in terror in the background. Then, silence. Disturbing.

this girl in the back of the theatre screamed “YOU CANT DO THAT!” in the most heartbroken voice everyone was quaking.

I was like “this is how it ends. They’ll find mebdead in this hall.” My friend and I gasped at the same time

I gasped so loudly but everyone was too stunned to say anything. My sister grabbed my hand and practically held me down.

i had a panic attack like i was literally hyperventilating and crying in the middle of the theatre lmfao

i gasped and immediately started sobbing

deltasquadformingup:

rebelmeg:

trickerydickerydock:

ragnarokgay:

trickerydickerydock:

ragnarokgay:

The reason they killed Loki in the first ten minutes is because Loki absolutely would not have hesitated to kill Vision, or steal the time stone.

Avengers: Someone’s killed Dr. Strange and Vision!

Loki, admiring his new necklace and glowing yellow paperweight: Tragic

Wanda: if we destroyed the mind stone it would kill Vision D:

Loki, already stabbing him: oh no

Thor: Hey, didn’t Midgard have a wizard around here earlier? Loki, you remember the wizard, right?

Loki, currently garroting Dr. Strange with the time stone: I don’t recall

I CAN’T STOP LAUGHING

Steve: We don’t trade lives

Loki, already trying to pop out the mind stone: who’s “we”