imperatorkhaleesi:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

glumshoe:

Lyft driver: “Your name, is Slavic? Me too. Bulgarian. I drive fast for you, brother.”

Now he’s waxing philosophical about the Ottoman Empire, imperialism, and human nature. “Humans? We are the most dangerous animal. Other animals, they kill when they need to. We kill when we think we need to. It is not the same.”

He just monologued about climate change and the military industrial complex, and the difficulty of having a Balkan identity when every Balkan country changes hands “every twenty years”. “Our history is getting swallowed by the biggest fish, and that fish getting swallowed by the next biggest fish, and so on.”

He had so many more gems. We compared family names, realized that his daughter shares my grandfather’s name (the feminine version), and then he started talking about The Old Country. The city where he grew up had a population of 300, and the population of his whole country could fit inside Chicago. He came here twenty years ago seeking a better life, but “everything in America is too big, the cars, the problems, the inequality”. He pointed to his phone and called it “stupid little computer” that’s meant to control his life, not to improve it, and how the world is getting steadily worse and the little people can’t do anything about it. He told me to continue my studies so that I don’t grow up to work in the service industry and can instead try to stop the concentration of power into the hands of corrupt people. Then he shrugged and said, “But who knows? Can anyone do it? I don’t know if it’s possible.”

I tipped him 25%.

You just met an Old God

@valkyriespalkyries

chimera-bones:

buxombibliophile:

bonesofthepast:

varanusindicus:

dezzoi:

la-vallett1:

dduane:

camwyn:

niamhermind:

keepyourhandsbusy:

hyena-butts:

everybodyilovedies:

thepioden:

roachpatrol:

joshnewberry:

people who complain about dinosaurs “not being scary anymore” because its been discovered they have feathers and are closely related to/ancestors of birds are so bizarre like

  • its not about how scary they are, they are/were real life animals and what matters is learning more about them, not how well they fit into your science fiction horror film lol
  • can you imagine a 13 foot chicken running at you with full intent to eat you??? thats fucking terrifying holy shit

peacocks are synonymous with vain, frivolous beauty and they will attack cars. they will attack you while you try to get to your car. they’re like six feet of useless feathers and they will destroy you. imagine if they were carnivorous and had functional spurs. 

a t-rex could look like a gay disco ball and i guarantee that you would fucking book it if it had a problem with you

listen

listen

have you ever met a swan

if anything the birdier they get the scarier they are

Australia literally fought a war against giant birds AND FUCKING LOST

@kidwithheadphones

Overheard in the student lounge:

“Oh man, I can’t deal with birds ‘cause they’re dinosaurs and sometimes it’s like they get this glint in their eyes and they remember.”

“Have you ever interacted with a goose? ‘Cause those things are dicks.”

If chickens were still the size of a T-Rex we’d all be dead. No question.

Feathered creatures that give some serious lie to the idea that feathered dinosaurs ain’t scary:

This is a bearded vulture, or lammergeier. It’s four feet long and has a nine foot wingspan and it eats bones.

This is a shoebill stork. It dropped the duck without biting down shortly after the picture was taken, but if it had decided not to-

… it could have been the end of the road for that duck.

This is the last thing a fish sees before a macaroni penguin eats it.

This is a secretary bird in the act of demonstrating to Lord Voldemort that he came to the wrong neighborhood, ese.

This is a goose.

This is a vulture.

This is a cassowary on the attack. 

Be glad I couldn’t find the actual gif of a pelican swallowing a fish, because it’s freakin’ Lovecraftian in its HEADS SHOULD NOT BEND THAT WAY factor. You’ll have to settle for the idea of a feathered dinosaur suddenly going GLORP and devouring its victims whole just like this lady here.

Steven Spielberg didn’t create these. These are the feet of an emu.

And this is what happens when a swan (this one is named Asboy; his father was Mr. Asbo, the first swan in the UK to get named after an anti-social behavior order in ‘honor’ of his tendency to attack boaters) decides it doesn’t like you. I should probably note that this one attacked a cow.

Respect the feathered dinosaur, yo.

Terrifying. The last two illustrate why you did not fuck around with the Children of Lir.

I suspected that a dinosaur could have been feathered after I heard that a T-Rex is the chickens’ ancestor.

For those who think dinos aren’t cool because they’re feathered…whatever, mutherfuckers.  Evolution doesn’t give two shits what you think is cool or not.

image
image
image
image
image

You showed a cassowary on the attack, but forgot to show what exactly it’s attacking with. Their feet are nearly identical to the Emu’s, except for one minor, teeny tiny detail: A five-inch claw for killing motherfuckers, raptor-style.

image
image

This is like the “fuck birds master post” and I love it because
Honestly,
Fuck. Birds.

DID I GHOSTWRITE THIS ENTIRE POST???

@fuckboyfisk

What Angers The Signs

luminatress:

*Check your Mars sign*

Aries: disrespect, mind games and manipulation, passiveness, lies, laziness, judgment, people who cannot speak up for themselves

Taurus: lack of control, unpredictability, being taunted, impatient people, abrupt changes

Gemini: boredom, routine, lack of attention from others, feeling caged in, not getting their way

Cancer: people prying into their emotions, assertiveness, lack of attention and affection, sudden changes

Leo: competition, getting no praise, being laughed at, made fun of, or ignored, messing up in front of others

Virgo: lack of mental stimulation, ill health, changes to their routine, bad grammar, laziness, being criticized or judged

Libra: rejection, settling for less, not being able to compromise, lack of peace and harmony, vulgarity, impulsive and assertive people

Scorpio: life in general, superficial people, lies, having nothing to challenge them or keep their focus, getting their ego bruised

Sagittarius: lack of freedom and personal space, no excitement, predictability, being controlled, intolerance

Capricorn: loss of control or focus, loud and unpredictable environments, irresponsibility from others, people who pity themselves, free loaders

Aquarius: intolerance, lack of understanding, having no freedom for self-expression, seeing others mistreated for their differences, sensitivity

Pisces: lack of sympathy and compassion from others, being scolded, being told to face reality, aggression, blunt and crude opinions, arrogance

Best Languages for Disney Songs

thewordsweresimple:

Not to say that these are the only or the absolute “best,” they’re just the languages that I listen to the songs in. Hope you enjoy!

How Far I’ll Go (Moana)

Almost There (The Princess and the Frog)

Let It Go / For the First Time in Forever (Frozen)

Reflection / Honor to Us All (Mulan)

Hakuna Matata (Lion King)

I See the Light / When Will My Life Begin? (Tangled)

  • French [I See the Light]
  • German [I See the Light]
  • Spanish (Latin American) [When Will My Life Begin?]
  • English [When Will My Life Begin?]

Love is an Open Door (Frozen)

skatergloss:

fyxan:

men’s loyalty to violence is disturbing.  when women want a life free of abuse, assault, threat, & coercion, men’s first suggestion is “learn to fight back. learn to defend yourself”.  i don’t want my life to be a fight.  i don’t want to “prove myself” through inflicting pain & fear. 
i don’t find violence and physical conflict fulfilling or self-actualising.  

they’re exhausting & dehumanizing

Tea only

Emotional Abuse:

maternalscars:

1) They are always right

Somehow, you will always be in the wrong. Facts and events get
twisted and you will always end up being the guilty party. Nothing they
do is ever their fault. They will have one set of rules for themselves
and another set for everyone else. They do not take responsibility for
their part and trying to get them to own up to something will leave you
disappointed and frustrated.

2) They blame others

As previously mentioned, emotional abusers are never to blame for
anything that goes wrong. They will somehow always be the victim. They
will steadfastly refuse to apologise for their actions and blame anyone
else,anything else to get off the hook. You are wasting your time if you
hope that your emotionally abusive partner will apologise and work hard
to change his/her ways. Why should they when it’s not their fault?

3) Gas-lighting

This involves making you believe things that didn’t really happen or
aren’t really there. For example telling you that they have told you
about an upcoming party that you are 100% sure they never told you
about. They will never doubt themselves. Instead they will roll their
eyes and insist they told you leaving you to doubt your memory. They
will push their version of reality on to you and you may end up feeling
as if you are going crazy, not knowing what is true anymore.

4) They are critical of others but do not apply the same rules to themselves

Emotional abusers often have low self-awareness. This is often
because they are more tuned in to others in order to control them and
manipulate them. Apart from being quite controlling characters, they are
known for their constant put-downs.

violaslayvis:

comcastkills:

a lot of people i’ve interacted with still think the whole chiquita death squads thing was only a rumor so I wanted to point out that they owned up to it and got fined.

https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2007/March/07_nsd_161.html

so a corporation literally funded right wing terrorists to kill innocent people and only got fined. $25 million. chiquita has annual revenues of $3 billion. that should really have been a wake up call to anyone thinking corporations are treated unfairly, but it wasn’t. this is capitalism.

Pepsi is also directly responsible for the coup of Allende. Allende was actually supposed to win the 1963 election, but was unable to bc corporations like Pepsi poured millions into his opponent’s campaign. In return, his opponent promised to protect their investments. In 1970, when Allende finally won, the CEO of PepsiCo explicitly demanded President Nixon stage a coup against Allende bc as a socialist, he would threaten Pepsi’s and other foreign investments. Pressured by these corporations, Nixon eventually took action https://www.theguardian.com/business/1998/nov/08/observerbusiness.theobserver